In most companies QC is a Manual process. Whether you do in house, outsource or offshore, Manual document QC is NOT acceptable when technology and options are available. Even if you outsource some of these, you are still spending time as part of “Oversight” that costs you time.
Several research articles and surveys point that QC takes 10% to 30% of overall time in document content life cycle. Imagine if the author or a senior resource is doing this task, you can do the math based on how many documents are being QCed per month. You can stop or minimize this $$ drain and free up time for your resources to do more value add tasks. Not just $$, but Cycle time can be improved drastically for faster turn-around.
Several research articles and surveys point that QC takes 10% to 30% of overall time in document content life cycle. Imagine if the author or a senior resource is doing this task, you can do the math based on how many documents are being QCed per month. You can stop or minimize this $$ drain and free up time for your resources to do more value add tasks. Not just $$, but Cycle time can be improved drastically for faster turn-around.
Checks: Standard Out-of-box checks for FDA, EU, and other regions + you can use any custom checks from our vast library to comply/meet your Rule books and current QC checklists. Currently we have pre-defined packages for Clinical documents (like CSR), Labeling (USPI/SPC), and others.
QC + Fix: Opt to fix the way you want when an error is found while running QC checks. Saves lot of time instead of pushing back to authors or you open documents and fix manually
File Options: PDF, Word
Mode: Real-time or Batch (for large size files, tool can directly push/pull from your current EDMS).
File Sources: Upload from your Desktop or use our pre-built connectors to SharePoint, Documentum, RIM, Vault, and several 3rd party Sources.
Access: Cloud (hosted on Private Cloud in USA/Germany) For high-volume projects, on-prem available.
